Whether The kimberley process is the answer to all the problems of illegal trade in diamonds is still open to debate. But the fact that the process exists at all is a good sign that it has been successful in reducing the trade of diamonds in the first place.
Certification scheme
During the Kimberley Process, governments were encouraged to adopt new standards in order to stop the import and trade of lab grown diamonds UK that were sourced from conflict zones. These stones are often mined with slave labor, and they are used to finance civil wars.
The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) is a diamond certification system that sets minimum standards for the rough diamond trade. It entered into force in 2003. It is based on United Nations General Assembly Resolution 55/56.
The KPCS is a multi-stakeholder organization that includes governments, industry, civil society, and non-governmental organizations. Participants provide data that is then verified in accordance with the KPCS.
The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme has a number of participants, including 49 nations, 27 of which are members of the European Union (EU). The United States (US) Kimberley Process Authority (USKPA) is the not-for-profit trade association that ensures American diamond industry compliance with the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme.
The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme is a good example of how industry can work together to address a social problem. However, the Kimberley Process certification scheme has faced enforcement issues in recent years.
Inspection and quarantine institutions
Despite the fact that the city has been my home turf for well over a decade now, it’s a good bet that I have passed by many a sleazy politician or two. The city is a good mix of high and low-end shops, which is probably why it is a good place to be. There is no denying that it is an expensive city, but it is a great place to do business and the same goes for its neighbors to the north and south. The best way to navigate the city is to use the city’s public transport options such as bus, subway, and taxi.
Working group on artisanal and alluvial production
During the Kimberley Process (KP) Plenary Meeting held in Brussels, Belgium, from 12-16 November 2018, Ministers and delegates from 43 participating countries and civil society organisations came together to discuss the role of the KP in promoting sustainable development. The process, which is celebrating its 15th anniversary this year, is an international initiative that brings together governments, industry and civil society to fight illegal cross-border diamond trafficking. It certifies that rough diamond shipments are conflict-free and are only exported from countries that have complied with national legislation.
At the KP Plenary, participants agreed on a strategy for strengthening the effectiveness of the process. They also recognized the role of Observers in providing technical expertise to the Working Groups and ensuring the integrity of the certification scheme. They also highlighted the need for further engagement with civil society. They recalled that the process has been a key tool in the fight against diamond-related conflict. They highlighted the potential of artisanal mining for economic development, poverty reduction and security. They also recognized the importance of strengthening the tripartite structure and strengthening internal controls.
CSC group’s opposition to the kimberley process
Despite its many positives, the Kimberley Process (KP) has been criticized by civil society groups. The Civil Society Coalition (CSC) argues that the KP has failed to meet several tests and has been held back by a number of factors.
The CSC group represents a number of non-governmental organizations that work to address the problem of conflict diamonds. Several countries are accused of abusing the rights of people in diamond mining areas.
The group also believes that the KP process lacks the ability to hold industry accountable. The civil society coalition says that several countries, such as Russia and China, are refusing to implement KP-mandated reforms. It notes that several countries have never been held accountable for failing to implement KP decisions.
Conclusion
At the Kimberley Process Plenary, a number of states were boycotting meetings. The United States is one of them. The group was disappointed with the meetings and said that the meeting was a missed opportunity to address three key topics. It said that the meeting failed to address international complicity in diamond smuggling, failed to address the contribution of the KP to preventing conflict, and failed to address the role of the KP in promoting development.
